Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Why Print Is Better Than Digital

 
Ajani John-Charles
Professor Rau
ENG 101-MD
October 27, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
           Reading the latest news on a handheld device can be convenient for everyone. Author Dan Blank of “Why Is Digital Better Than Print” explains why digital media is better to use than print media. Blank presents reasonable points against print media and points supporting digital media. Digital media is less cumbersome than print, but lacks authenticity and security.
Newspapers and magazines can prevent false information from landing on their platforms. The print media has gatekeepers, or Editors. It is their job to keep the following print source as factual and tangible as possible. In the digital realm, the truth in articles are either stretched out or completely altered since there is no type of refuge in maintaining authenticity.
Print Media can contain its original form. Blank stated that “It can be clipped, photocopied, and saved (Blank).” A person could do all of the following actions with a printed source and will still be able to locate its unique style. Once a piece of information from an article founded in a newspaper ends up digitized, it loses its validity. “No longer confined to one medium, it can morph, evolve, be segment or expanded, be updated, be aggregated, be hyperlinked, and mashed up (Blank).” A controversial article from New York Times would be in danger of being completely plagued with misleading information the second it transfers into the digital world.
Anybody can write an article online and put their name on it. Wikipedia’s open nature to everyone allows an online user to change an entire article and claim it. This will be detrimental to whoever takes out information from it. The person who comprehensively changed the article, could have inputted nothing but their opinions. Blank indicated that “the web has given each every one of us a voice in this world (Blank).” Digital media gives people access to practice their freedom of speech on every topic available on the internet. However, the print media allows people to practice their freedom of speech as well, but to an extent.
The print media can contain single, controlled content. It was said that “the op-ed page of the New York Times was the most important page in the newspaper because it contained the voice of the people (Blank).”  Unlike the Digital aspect of news articles, print media have the power to maintain their content and limit the voice of the people. It helps the reader locate the primary source of a topic about politics or business. As years progressed, digital media encourages people to “publish their own content and comment on the content created by others (Blank).” Between these two mediums, print is more practical and concrete to go to if real, factual information is desired.
 
Blank, Dan. “Why Digital Is Better Than Print.” I Feel Fine: How I Learned To Stop Worrying         and Love The Web. danblank.com. n. p. 5 August 2000. Web 20 October 2014

1 comment:

  1. I agree! The issue of security is certainly an issue. I also agree to the fact that the authenticity of the information found online can be skeptical. The saying "don't believe everything you see on the internet" is such a true statement. The fact that many DO, in fact, have a voice on the internet, it makes finding the reliable truth VERY difficult.
    Digital may have many benefits in terms of learning a broad and very basic idea of what it is you are researching but print is definitely more reliable.

    ReplyDelete